BLOG > NEWS 

Is the S&P 500 All You Really Need?

 

For many investors, the S&P 500 feels like a natural choice. It’s often described as ‘the market,’ and its recent performance has been undeniably strong. But is investing solely in the S&P 500 the best long term approach? Let’s take a closer look.

What is the S&P 500?

The S&P 500 Index measures the performance of 500 of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States. These are called “large cap” companies, meaning they have very high “market capitalizations”, a term used for businesses with the highest total stock value in the market (calculated by multiplying their stock price by the number of shares they’ve issued). Together, these companies represent roughly 80% of the total U.S. stock market value, which is why the S&P 500 is generally considered a useful proxy for the U.S. stock market. However, despite its coverage, the index excludes medium-sized and smaller companies, international stocks, bonds, and alternative investments like commodities and real estate. So while it gives
you a big piece of the U.S. economy, it leaves a lot of other markets and investable assets on the table.

What else is out there?

The global investment universe is much bigger than just large U.S. companies. Below is a quick guide through the other investable asset classes that are out there, as well as major indices that represent them:

  • US Stocks beyond Large Cap:
    • Mid-Cap Stocks (S&P MidCap 400): Mid sized US companies
    • Small-Cap Stocks (Russell 2000): Small US companies
  • International Stocks
    • From Developed Markets (MSCI EAFE): Stocks from Europe, Australia, and parts of Asia such as Japan and Singapore.
    • From Emerging Markets (MSCI EM): Stocks from regions such as Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and parts of Asia
  • Bonds (Also known as “Fixed Income”)
    • US “Investment-Grade” Bonds (Bloomberg US Aggregate): Bonds issued by U.S. borrowers who are considered very likely to pay their debts on time, and thus carry a low risk of default. They include U.S. government bonds, mortgage backed securities (which are often government guaranteed) and high quality corporate bonds
    • High Yield Bonds (ICE BofA High Yield): Also called “junk bonds,” these pay higher interest but come with more risk
    • International Bonds (Bloomberg Global Agg ex-USD): Bonds from non-U.S. issuers
  • Alternative Investments
    • Real Estate (DJ US Real Estate): Investments in companies that own or manage physical properties such as apartment buildings, shopping centers, office spaces, and even parking garages. These are often packaged into vehicles called REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts), which allow investors to earn income from real estate without owning property directly.
    • Commodities (Bloomberg Commodity): Raw materials like oil, metals (including precious metals such as Gold), and agriculture
    • Many others: Usually more complex or less accessible to everyday investors, examples include hedge funds, digital assets, private equity, venture capital, and collectibles like art or wine.

How has the S&P 500 actually performed over time?

As shown above, the S&P 500 is just one piece of a complex and diverse global investment
picture. To understand how it stacks up against other options, we can look at the chart below,
which includes the returns of the S&P 500 as well as every other index mentioned in the
previous section:

Data shows how much a $1 investment in each asset class would have grown from 1997 through 2025, with gains compounding annually. The colored vertical bands in the background indicate which asset class was the top performer in each calendar year.

Despite its recent strong run, the S&P 500 hasn’t always been the star of the show. From the chart above, we can observe the following facts:

  • For the 1998 to 2012 period, the S&P 500 was the worst performing asset class of the major indices compared
  • During the entire 1998-2025 period, it has only ranked as the top performer in 4 out of the 28 years (14% of the time), 3 of which occurred since 2019. By contrast, Real Estate and Emerging Markets each took the top spot in 7 of the 28 years,
  • Even when accounting for the last decades’ historic run of the S&P 500, Mid Cap Stocks (S&P 400) have been the best performers overall since 1998
  • No single asset class consistently leads

 

Even over very long periods, the S&P 500 hasn’t always dominated. The chart below shows the
performance of small cap vs. large cap stocks dating back to 1926:

Data shows how much a $1 investment in each asset class would have grown from 1997 through 2025, with gains compounding annually. The colored vertical bands in the background indicate which asset class was the top performer in each calendar year.

Raw data source: Morningstar. Indices used are for illustrative purposes only and are not investable. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All returns reflect total return performance, including reinvested dividends. Indexes represent broad asset class benchmarks and may not reflect the performance of actual investments.

Small companies have historically outperformed returns wise over the long run, despite large companies outperforming 52% of the calendar years on the chart.

This period includes multi decade stretches where the S&P 500 delivered flat or even negative
returns based on the index price, notably 1930–1950 (-1.16% return per year), 1962–1975
(-0.26% return per year), and 2000–2013(-0.15% return per year).

Why does everyone love the S&P 500 now?

Because recently, it’s been fantastic. Since 2013, the S&P 500, as tracked by the VOO ETF (a popular fund that mirrors the index), has delivered an annual total return (dividends included) of over 14%, significantly outpacing its historical average of about 11.05% compounded annual returns since 1970. That’s a tremendous performance, and it explains why so many portfolios have been tilted heavily, or entirely, towards this index.

So why not just the S&P 500?

There’s no denying it: the S&P 500 has been on an incredible run. From the start of 2013 through 2025 so far, it’s delivered an average annual price return of about 12.4%, which is well above its historical average of 8.8% from 1928 to 2012

That sounds extraordinary, and it is strong, but it’s not that far outside the range of what the S&P 500 has done before. Statistically speaking, it’s only about 0.21 standard deviations above its long-term average, which makes it an above average stretch, but not an outlier. That’s largely because the S&P 500 is a highly volatile investment. Some years deliver double digit gains, others double digit declines, making it riskier and less predictable than many realize. That kind of volatility isn’t suited for everyone, and it’s one more reason why relying solely on the S&P 500 may not be the best approach. When you have that kind of swing built into an investment, periods of strong performance like this aren’t as rare as they might seem.

Still, past success doesn’t guarantee future results. As we’ve shown, the S&P 500 hasn’t always been the best performer. In fact, there have been long stretches, including entire multi-decade periods, where the index had stagnant and even negative returns, falling behind other investments like real estate, small cap stocks, or emerging markets.

Relying solely on one group of U.S. large companies to carry your entire portfolio might have produced great results for a while, but that doesn’t make it the right long term strategy. It also means ignoring a much broader universe of opportunities. Markets move in cycles, what’s leading today can lag tomorrow, and that’s why diversification matters.

The S&P 500 can certainly be a strong foundation, but it’s not the whole picture. A well balanced portfolio, spread across different company sizes, regions, and types of investments, can help reduce risk by spreading it across areas that don’t always move in the same direction. This way, when one part of the market struggles, others may hold steady or even grow, helping you stay on track for long term success.

The bottom line: Diversifying for the long term

It’s easy to chase past performance, and hard to resist the S&P 500’s stellar recent run. But history shows that diversification is the more resilient strategy. No one knows exactly what the next decade will look like, but spreading your investments across multiple asset classes gives you more ways to win, and fewer ways to lose.

At rebel Financial, we help investors build well diversified portfolios tailored to their individual goals, preferences, and comfort with risk. If you’re wondering whether your portfolio may be too concentrated in the S&P 500, or if there’s room to better align it with your long term objectives and risk tolerance, we’re currently offering a complimentary portfolio review and personalized
risk analysis meeting to help you find out.

It’s completely free with no obligation, just an honest, professional review to help you validate your current approach or uncover new opportunities, helping you make confident decisions about your investments. To get started, simply visit the portfolio analysis page on our website by clicking on this link, where you can schedule your complimentary portfolio analysis meeting.

In our next article, we’ll explore the concept of “False Diversification”, the common situation where owning multiple funds gives the illusion of diversification, but in reality, results in overlapping or overly concentrated positions. We’ll also look at frequent mistakes even professionals make when trying to build diversified portfolios, and how to avoid them. Stay tuned!

Did you find this article helpful? Share it!

ABOUT AUTHOR

Franco Iozzo

Franco is a CFA level 2 candidate, holds a Master’s degree in Financial Mathematics from North Carolina State University (2024), and has been with rebel since the summer of 2024. He started as an Investments Intern, and quickly earned a role as an Investment Analyst & Trader upon completion of his Master’s. He previously worked as a Retail Trading Specialist at TD Ameritrade (now Charles Schwab), and holds the Series 7, Series 63 and Series 65 licenses

Disclaimer: The information contained on this blog is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as professional financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your individual circumstances and objectives. Before making any investment decisions, you should consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax advisor, and/or attorney to determine what may be best for your individual situation.